NAR

Investor's take on the NAR Housing Data by Jake Harris

Investor’s Take on the NAR Housing Data

I often am out there talking to my compadres in the real estate investing world, as I find it helpful to not only look at reams of data but also talk to other people within my industry. I have also discovered over the years that very few investor types actually network with each other. Usually it is the old school mentality that they might steal my deal or idea or maybe because we have become so accustomed to beating each other up on properties that we have some underlying resentment towards each other. In my younger years my only reference was some old school developer types that were (probably still are) highly secret about anything they are doing. To put those fears aside I have found that in today’s technology day in age it is actually very difficult to get any proprietary deals, and people pretty much see everything if they wanted to look. I’m not saying that proprietary deals don’t exist but ironically enough they are usually sourced through your network. I have also found that as I network more I am exposed to new ideas or variations on my ideas. And I’m not talking the MLM (multi-level marketing) networking, I am talking about making genuine connections and building friendships and relationships.

Challenge: When was the last time you reached out to someone and had some coffee or lunch? Go do that, I promise you it will be more worthwhile than the cost of the lunch.  

Back to my point, my fellow investors don’t really need a NAR report to tell them what is going on in the market as they are living the data on a day to day basis and what we are seeing is the regression to the mean on these DOM and a slight pull back on pricing. Their sentiment is that the market in Sacramento and most of the West coast is much softer these days. Given the overall lack of distressed “good” deals and buyers being even more picky than usual. The buyers that watched Blackstone (Invitation Homes) come in and buy up several thousand homes for rentals helped stimulate a 15-20% market appreciation (Which is good if you own a house, bad if you are looking to buy one). Well those buyers feel like they have missed out on getting an affordable house. As a result the prices are much higher and rates are slightly higher (4.19% 30 year fixed currently) so they are holding out and looking for that perfect house and some are actually being unrealistic but there is nothing in the market to externally motivate them.

My take on the market is we are seeing a lot less distress in the market. The investors, me included have been picking the low hanging fruit “Deals” for several years now. With the lack of low hanging fruit the competition has been forced to do 4 things.

     1) Move to areas with more deals/less competition

     2) Accept lower and lower returns

     3) Find a new niche or value add component (additions, new builds, commercial)

     4) Close up shop and move on (take their ball and go home)

The fact that we are seeing less distressed properties being sold. The bidding wars coming to an end, plus the DOM are on the rise this business gets less and less profitable by the day. I have been seeing many of my competitors do some variation of all 4 of those options. 

DOM (Days on Market)

I’ve mentioned it a few times in a couple of blogs. But, why do the DOM matter that much? As an investor it’s almost just as beneficial to sell a property quickly as it is to sell it for maximized price. The reason for this is a lot of investors are looking at the annualized rate of return.


Scenario 1)  If I invest in a house for 100k and sell it for 120k in 3 months my profit is 20k and my annualized return is 80% (20% x 4)

Scenario 2) If I Invest in that same house for 100k and sell it for 130k in 6 months my profit is 30k but annualized return drops to 60%. (30% x 2)


Which of those would scenarios you rather?

Well to me both are good options but it really depends on the underlying objectives and market conditions. If you have 5 million dollars and you can only buy 2 million worth of good deals because of lack of inventory. Then I would lean towards the maximize profits because you can’t source enough deals (spend all your money). If the market has a ton of deals that fit your pricing matrix then you go for lower return but higher volume as the velocity of that money is much higher at 4x vs 2x.

What usually happens is a combination of those two, you can source a certain amount of deals in this environment and you are typically holding back a little just in case that home run deal comes along. But given the opportunity to make a quick exit you will usually take it .  Now the flip side of that is the hold times start creeping up there the investor mentality is to cut bait given a 6+ month hold time. They feel like they are chasing a bad return and would almost rather cut the pricing to break even and just be done with it in hopes their next deal is better than that one.

Less properties = Less competition

Now that we are seeing less distressed properties what does that mean for the future. My take on it is that it is a good thing. The bigger funds with massive overhead have to move on to greener pastures or get bogged down chasing too few deals. The midsize funds battle it out and lean up, doing more with less and take some hits on a few properties as the market adjust to an environment where the buyers rule to roost. This will drive some of the other midsize funds to move on as well. The mom and pops in general will take the biggest hit as they typically will have all their money in 1 or 2 deals and if they take losses on those then they will quickly exit the market.

There is still levels of distress coming down the pipeline but the banks have gotten better at how they dispose of it and with levels of competition lower there will be some opportunity for a patient but well-funded investors. As the vacuum of the competition leaving the markets will allow for some deals to slip through the cracks.

But and this is a big but, since that low hanging fruit is gone all of the investments should be based on solid fundamentals not speculation of the market. I’ll go more into the fundamentals in the future.

God Bless and go network with someone

Jake

Existing Homes sales slow 1.8% in August: Why it’s not as big of a deal as the media is making it to be. by Jake Harris


If you read any of the major news websites (msn, fox, yahoo) you will certainly see that the stock market has seen a decent dip today based on the home sales data released from the National Association of Realtors (NAR) for August.

The report shows a decrease in existing sales of 1.8% for the month. Although the media likes to sensational any tidbit of information to get people to click on their stories. The slowdown is somewhat expected. Let me tell you why.

If you look at a normal sales cycle of existing homes throughout the year the selling season is typically thought of to start the weekend after the Super bowl and winding down on Labor Day (Feb through Aug). It has an upswing starting in spring peaking in the start of the summer and then winds down to finish out the year on a slide. As you can see in the charts below:

If we take a more macro view of the housing market, say in the last 10 years. We have been in an atypical real estate market for almost the entire time. So making an assumptions based on any of this data is somewhat flawed because it doesn’t have enough consistent samples, especially making bold headline worthy statements from a month to month change in the sales volume.

What I mean by an atypical market is: that is in 2004 through 2007 we had a frenzy of activity and run up on pricing and volume of sales which was stimulated by sub-prime borrowing (free money). We then had the bubble bursting crash resulting in a drastic cliff like fall off in volume and pricing in 2007 and 2008. In 2009 we went to a dead nothing happening market (housing had flat lined). To 2010 and 2011 activity was sporadic in volume and in specific areas, given that the sales were mostly driven by early investors looking to buy assets at well below market pricing. Finally by 2012 we started to get back to a little bit of a normal cycle, as lending standards had loosened, and buyers felt like the housing had stabilized plus we had people that went through foreclosure now re-entering the market. But really 2013 and now 2014 are more of what would be considered something of a normal sale cycle.

Days on Market (DOM)

In addition to getting back to what a normal sale cycle looks like we have also seen more traditionally normal market times. If we look at DOM in the post housing bubble time of 2010-2012 we saw the inventory vastly distressed and at substantial discounts. Especially in areas hit hardest by foreclosures (CA , NV and AZ). Which resulted in mostly investor’s and cash buyers gobbling up inventory at insane rates. At one point we had less than a month inventory on the market in parts of California. This led to bidding wars and almost non-existent DOM times. Now that we are in these more normal sell cycles of 2013 and 2014 we are seeing a regression to the mean on DOM times. Which is ranging between 30-60 days before a house will go into contract.

All of these trends are actually normal in variety and by no means headline worthy. However I don’t think that is going to stop anymore from writing about them like they might be.

The one thing to note about the data was the continued decrease in distressed sales (Foreclosures, Short Sales). As well as a continued increase of equity sales (Homeowners). This shows signs that more investors are existing the market as the majority of the low hanging fruit has been picked and the homeowners are starting to pick up the slack as the prices have increased to relieve some of the homeowners that were upside down.

God Bless

- Jake